Review of Literature (CATHTER ASSOCIATED URINARY TRACT INFECTION)

$21.00

Write a paper (1,500-2,000 words) in which you analyze and appraise each of the (15) articles identified in Module 1. Pay particular attention to evidence that supports the problem, issue, or deficit, and your proposed solution.

Hint: The Module 2 Readings provide appraisal questions that will assist you to efficiently and effectively analyze each article.

Refer to "Sample Format for Review of Literature," " and "Module 2: Checklist."

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Description

The available literature seems to indicate that silver-coated catheters are more effective than uncoated catheters. Catheters have found ready application in the medical field. Their application can be found in dressing wounds, and development of urinary and intravenous solutions. However, studies that have been performed to compare the effectiveness between silver-coated and uncoated catheters seem to have different findings. This review will evaluate the inconsistencies and other key differences that exist on this subject.

Caudill, T. (2005). Reduction in catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) using a silver-coated all-silicone Foley catheter versus a silver-impregnated latex Foley catheter in a southeastern U.S. long-term acute care facility. American Journal of Infection control, 33(5), 60

The study was conducted in a 49 bed long-term acute care facility in the Southeastern U.S. and seems to suggest that silver coated catheters are more effective than non-coated catheters. The article also contains a cost analysis of the silver versus non-coated catheters. Caudill recommends further investigation of silver-coated all silicone Foley catheters as they could have more benefits compared to other silicon coated models.