Decision in James Hardie Case

$36.00

Order Now

Description

Decision in James Hardie Case

Decision in James Hardie Case

answer


In the 21st century a company that fails to respond to social issues is doomed to face the wrath of the consumers (Gaudier, 1999 p.29). This includes threatening to boycott the goods as it happened in the case of James Hardie Ltd. The company’s failure to fully compensate the victims of the asbestos related ailments had seen various governments’ intervention which pushed the management to negotiations in order to avoid further loss.

Decision in James Hardie Case

In the recent past Corporate and social responsibility has come to mean quite a lot of things to the organizations and the public. It is not simply “taking it back” to the community in the form of providing social amenities; construction of schools, hospitals, roads etc but responding to issues to do with the environment, humans, non humans and even non living things such as landscape. The present generation has the role and responsibility to take good care of the environment and its people. This will in turn ensure that the future generation benefits from similar resources enjoyed by the present generation (Attfield, 1999 p.98).