Indigenous Environmental Digital Education for Cultural Survival

Introduction – Indigenous Environmental Digital Education for Cultural Survival

Several indigenous people face severe environmental degradation which impact their cultural lives, traditional governance systems, foods, and knowledge systems. This study gives a critical discussion of the impact of digital education on indigenous people for cultural survival with a focus on the Australian aborigines. The cause of the challenges and environmental issues facing the indigenous people lies on their culture and their relationship with the environment. For instance, due to the nature of their lives, the indigenous people do not have the advantage of the digital technology which would help in making their lives easier.

Some of the indigenous people in Australia do not have control over their land or traditional territories and hence they do not make decisions on how their land would be used and how their children would access education. It is important to define the concept of environmental philosophy. According to Anuik and Gillies (2012), environmental philosophy examines the relationship between human beings and the natural environment.

Pay to Unlock the Answer!


Environmental philosophy indicates that human beings should clearly understand and relate with the environment. In doing this, there is a need to using digital technology such as the website and social media. This study deduces that many indigenous Australians have strong relationship with their country and culture and since they are considered as isolated community, they should use digital technology to connect with people outside their immediate environments. This study further deduces that the indigenous people have poor ways of passing knowledge and skills to the next generation. Indigenous Environmental Digital Education for Cultural Survival.

Therefore, digital technology such as digital camera would improve knowledge transfer because they can take photos and record videos of their environment to be viewed by the next generation. However, there is limited research on the indigenous environmental digital education for cultural survival and hence several studies should be conducted focusing on this topic. Indigenous Environmental Digital Education for Cultural Survival.       


Anuik, Jonathan. & Gillies, Carmen. 2012. ‘Indigenous knowledge in post-secondary educators’ practices: Nourishing the learning spirit.’ Canadian Journal of Higher Education 42(1): 63-79.

Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2017. ‘National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander social survey.’ Australian Bureau of Statistics 1-10

Birch, Tony. 2016. ‘Climate Change, Mining and Traditional Indigenous Knowledge in Australia’. Social Inclusion 4 (1): 92–101. Indigenous Environmental Digital Education for Cultural Survival.

Bradley, John, and Stephen Johnson. 2015. ‘Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Can the West Come to Know?’ PAN: Philosophy Activism Nature, no. 11.

Chikonzo, Agnes. 2006. ‘The potential of information and communication technologies in collecting, preserving and disseminating indigenous knowledge in Africa.’ The International Information & Library Review 38(3): 132-138. DOI:

Clifford, Holly., Pearson, Glenn., Franklin, Peter., Walker, Roz. And Zosky, Graeme. 2015. ‘Environmental health challenges in remote Aboriginal Australian communities: Clean air, clean water and safe housing.’ Australian Indigenous Health Bulletin 15(2): 45-56

Corbett, Jon., Singleton, Guy. And Muir, Kado. 2010. ‘Web 2.0 for Aboriginal cultural survival: A new Australian outback movement.’ Participatory Learning and Action 71-79. Indigenous Environmental Digital Education for Cultural Survival.

Fourmile, Henrietta. 2002. ‘Indigenous Peoples, the Conservation of Traditional Ecological Knowledge, and Global Governance’. In Global Ethics and Environment, edited by Nicholas Low, 215–46. Routledge.

Kapyrka, Julie. and Dockstator, Mark. 2012. ‘Indigenous knowledge and western knowledge in environmental education: Acknowledging the tensions for the benefits of a ‘two-worlds’ approach.’ Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 17(2): 97- 110

Lowan-Trudeau, Greg. 2012. ‘Methodological metissage: An interpretative indigenous approach to environmental education research.’ Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 17(1): 113-126

Makinde, Omawumi and Shorunke, Oludare. 2013. ‘Exploiting the Values of Indigenous Knowledge in Attaining Sustainable Development in Nigeria: The place of the Library.’ Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 908, 3-15. Indigenous Environmental Digital Education for Cultural Survival.

Nakata, Martin. 2002. ‘Indigenous Knowledge and the Cultural Interface: underlying issues at the intersection of Knowledge and information systems.’ IFLA Journal 28(5/6): 281-291

Rice, Emma., Haynes, Emma., Royce, Paul. and Thompson, Sandra. 2016. ‘Social media and digital technology use among indigenous young people in Australia: A literature review.’ International Journal for Equity in Health 15(2): 81-89

Shepherd, Carrington., Li, Jianghong., and Zubrick, Stephen. 2012. ‘Social gradients in the health of indigenous Australians.’ American Journal of Public Health 102(1): 107-117. Indigenous Environmental Digital Education for Cultural Survival.

Sweet, Melissa., Pearson, Luke. and Dudgeon, Pat. 2013. ‘Indigenous X: A case study of community-led innovation in digital media. Media international Australia.’ Inc Culture Policy 149(1): 104-115

Whyte, Kyle. 2013. ‘On the role of traditional ecological knowledge as a collaborative concept: A philosophical study.’ Ecological Processes 2(7): 45-60. DOI: Indigenous Environmental Digital Education for Cultural Survival.