Positionality Based On Three Educational Theorists

Introduction – Positionality Based On Three Educational Theorists

The concepts of teaching and gaining education have, for a long time, been hard to explain. The way a teacher explains to students and the way they understand what is taught by the teacher has become a topic of debate with different people raising different positions. Attaining education may happen through different ways where a student learns on his or her own from the notes and guidelines provided by the teacher or by listening to the narrations made by the teacher on a concept. Positionality Based On Three Educational Theorists.

Education is viewed differently by many people with some people viewing it as a difficult task that require a lot of efforts and others view it as a simple way of conceptualizing concepts and ideas (Knight 2007: 54).

Pay to Unlock the Answer!

School was, and is still, considered as the chief socializing mechanism that is in between the family and the world of work. In this case, people go to school to acquire knowledge. This knowledge id acquired through the process of interaction. Discipline has been a major theme in the work of the theorist where he indicates that as time went by, the negative features of discipline were changed to positive ones and this became of primary importance in the establishment and development of schooling as a wide society disciplinary technology (Deacon 2006: 177). It should be noted that without discipline education cannot be acquired.

List of references

Alexander, B., Anderson, G., & Gallegos, B. (2005) Performance Theories in Education: Power, Pedagogy, and the Politics of Identity. New Jersey: Sage, 44-69

Carr, W. (1989) Quality in Teaching: Arguments for a Reflective Profession. New Jersey: Wiley, 18-38

Cole, B (2009) Education for liberation: The Paulo Freire Methodology [online]. Alliance for Metropolitan Stability Thesis. [Accessed 26 March 2012]. Available at: <http://www.metrostability.org/efiles/EDUCATION_FOR_LIBERATION.pdf>.

Craft, A., Jeffrey, B., & Leibling, M. (2001) Creativity in Education. London: Free Press, 108-124

Deacon, R. (2006) ‘Michel Foucault on Education: A Preliminary Theoretical Overview.’ South African Journal of Education, 26(2): 177-187

Debrix, F. (2003) Language, Agency, and Politics in a Constructed World. New York: Sage, 6-23

Foucault, M. (2002) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Sage, 56-98

Foucault, M. (2008) The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge. New Jersey: Wiley, 1-19

Freire, P. (1993) Pedagogy of the Oppressed [online]. Webster Education [Accessed 26 Mrach 2012]. Available at: <http://www.webster.edu/~corbetre/philosophy/education/freire/freire-2.html>.

Jablonski, J. (2006) Academic Writing Consulting ad WAC: Methods and Models for Guiding Cross-curricular Literacy Work. New York: Wiley, 12-78

Johns, C. (2009) Becoming a Reflective Practitioner. New Jersey: Sage, 281-309

Knight, S. (2007) Understanding Positionality: A Narrative Study in Teacher Education. Victoria: Open Press, 54-67

Manzon, M. (2011) Comparative Education: The Construction of a Field. Sudbury: Routledge, 19-56

McLaren, P. & Leornard, P. (1993) Paulo Freire : A Critical Encounter. London: Prentice Hall, 69-78

Micheletti, G. (2010) Re-Envisioning Paul Freire’s “Banking Concept of Education”. Student Pulse [online]. 2(2) pp. 1-2 [Accessed 26 March 2012]. Available at: <http://www.studentpulse.com/articles/171/re-envisioning-paulo-freires-banking-concept-of-education>.

Redmond, B. (2006) Reflection in Action: Developing Reflective Practice in Health and Social Services. Victoria: Free Press, 11-54

Rizvi, F. & Lingard, B. (2010) Globalizing Education Policy. Sudbury: Dovers, 48-69

Rossatto, C. (2005) Engaging Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of Possibility: From Blind to Transformative Optimism. New York: Wiley, 78-91

Schon, D. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Profession. Manchester: Sage, 32-65