Introduction -Land Law – Mutuality Principle
Despite that majority of human laws are received with great contention among people, the mutuality principle has stood to be the most contested in the contemporary society. Many scholars and philosophers have offered opposing viewpoints on the efficiency of the mutuality principle. The issue of bias and inefficiencies has been adequately attributed to this principle by many scholars. Land Law – Mutuality Principle. Despite that many scholars have also embraced the principle; the criticism attributed to it is very explicit. Primarily, mutuality principle is established by case law and is developed on the proposition that organizations can not develop income from itself. Based on the principle, if a group of people contribute a common fund, any surpluses from the common fund can not be counted as income.
With reference to the discussion and analysis of the principle of mutuality, it is evident that it is overwhelmed by numerous weaknesses. The principle has been adequately challenged by different scholars for creating loopholes on tax evasion. Land Law – Mutuality Principle. The key elements of the principles concerning exemption from tax to entities which are aimed at serving a common goal or benefits to members has been highly criticized. In this case, it should be noted that the principle is the only way to pass over burden of a positive freehold covenant. With regards to the weaknesses or the principle significant reformulation and reviews need to be undertaken on the mutuality principle. Land Law – Mutuality Principle.
Barkoczy, S. 2010. Australian Tax Casebook. New York: McGraw Hill, 87-107.
Baxt, R. 2004. Cases and Materials on Taxation. London: Routldge, 674-723. Land Law – Mutuality Principle.
Demange, G. and Laroque, G. 2006. Finance and the Economics of Uncertainty. London:
Routldge, 138-212. Land Law – Mutuality Principle.
DeMarco, J. 2004. A Coherence Theory in Ethics. New York: Wiley & Sons Press, 130-157.
Eeckhoudt, L. et al. 2005. Economics and Financial Decisions under Risk. New York: Routldge,
159-213. Land Law – Mutuality Principle.
Hakiki, L. 2003. Direct Taxes. New York: Prentice Hall, 87-152.
Ides, A. and May, C. 2008. Civil Procedure: cases and Problems. New York: McGraw Hill, 67-
85. Land Law – Mutuality Principle
Jones, C. 2008. Financial Economics. London: Prentice Hall, 100-143.
Lal, B. 2008. Income Tax and Central Sales Tax Law and Practice. London: Wiley & Sons
Lengwiler, Y. 2006. Micro foundations of Financial Economics: An Introduction to General
Equilibrium Asset Pricing. New York: Routldge, 287: 321.
Nethercott, L. 2010. Master Tax Examples, 2010/11. New York: Prentice Hall, 48-79.
Renton, N. 2005. Clubs and Non-Profits: keeping the Books- A Simple Manual on Accounts and
Tax. New Jersey: McGraw Hill Press, 61-98.
Seidman, J. 2003. Seidman’s Legislative History of Federal Income and Excess Profits Tax
Laws. New York: Prentice Hall, 1489-1487.
Trefil, J. 2003. The Nature of Science: An A-Z Guide to the Laws and Principles Governing our
Universe. London: Prentice Hall, 285-302.