State of Confusion

Introduction – State of Confusion

The governance of states has been a highly contested issue in many countries and more specifically the US. The controversy has been raised concerning the imposition of statutes by individual states to regulate various departments. Some of the regulations have been on parks, road use, and recreational facilities among others. In this case, the statute implemented by the state of confusion concerning trucks to use B-type truck hitch has raised a lot of concerns. State of Confusion.

In this case, the statute requires all towing trailers and trucks using its highways to be fixed with B-type truck hitch.

Pay to Unlock the Answer!

.The fourth stage entails the resolution before the trial statement which will be followed by trial and verdict. The six stage come after the judgment and collecting of money, whereby the loser will be required to pay for damages. The seventh and final state is the appeal which requires a review of the verdict offered (Tamanaha, 2006).


In summation, it should be clearly noted that each state has powers to enact different statues to regulate various departments. This should however be fair and out of controversy to other states. In this case, the statue by confusion is unconstitutional based on the high controversies surrounding it. In this case, Tanya’s suit is justified and has to prevail based on the invalidity of the statue related to it.


Brister, M. (2010). State of Confusion Paper. Retrieved on 8th Nov 2011, from:

Tamanaha, B. (2006). Law as a means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law. New York: Prentice